<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Losey’s The Go-Between – A Look Back	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://travelingboy.com/travel/loseys-go-between-look-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://travelingboy.com/travel/loseys-go-between-look-back/</link>
	<description>Traveling Adventures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 17:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas Yotka		</title>
		<link>https://travelingboy.com/travel/loseys-go-between-look-back/#comment-25838</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Yotka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 17:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://travelingboy.com/travel/?p=3297#comment-25838</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In answer to Mr. Mundkowsky&#039;s review I think I will leave it to Leslie Hartley to respond, via his letter of 
February 4, 1969 letter to screenwriter Harold Pinter:
&quot;After much tribulation with my proofs I have now finished your script of The Go-Between.
It is absolutely splendid - and more faithful to the letter and spirit of the book than I could have
believed possible - seeing that there are bound to be changes in translating a work from one medium
to another.
You needn&#039;t have said &#039;based&#039; on &#039;The Go-Between&#039; -
for it IS The Go-Between ! - the essence of it.
The dialogue, which I thought might sound old-fashioned, you have somehow,
without altering it appreciably, given an infusion of new life, or perhaps just
TIMELESSNESS. And the emotion of the story come through at every word -
I wept at the scene where Leo questions Ted about &#039;spooning&#039; - which is more
than I did when I wrote my version of it.
To have condensed to much, without ever losing - rather, with enhancing and
pin-pointing (if one can use such an expression) the essentials of it, is indeed
a triumph.&quot;
Now perhaps Mr. Mundkowsky will reply, &quot;Well, L.P. Hartley doesn&#039;t know what
HIS novel really is about, and neither do the film-makers.&quot; 
But some us who have enjoyed this film for the last 50 years may offer the polite
but firm counter: NO, Mr. Mundkowsky, it is YOU who are &quot;talking through
your hat&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In answer to Mr. Mundkowsky&#8217;s review I think I will leave it to Leslie Hartley to respond, via his letter of<br />
February 4, 1969 letter to screenwriter Harold Pinter:<br />
&#8220;After much tribulation with my proofs I have now finished your script of The Go-Between.<br />
It is absolutely splendid &#8211; and more faithful to the letter and spirit of the book than I could have<br />
believed possible &#8211; seeing that there are bound to be changes in translating a work from one medium<br />
to another.<br />
You needn&#8217;t have said &#8216;based&#8217; on &#8216;The Go-Between&#8217; &#8211;<br />
for it IS The Go-Between ! &#8211; the essence of it.<br />
The dialogue, which I thought might sound old-fashioned, you have somehow,<br />
without altering it appreciably, given an infusion of new life, or perhaps just<br />
TIMELESSNESS. And the emotion of the story come through at every word &#8211;<br />
I wept at the scene where Leo questions Ted about &#8216;spooning&#8217; &#8211; which is more<br />
than I did when I wrote my version of it.<br />
To have condensed to much, without ever losing &#8211; rather, with enhancing and<br />
pin-pointing (if one can use such an expression) the essentials of it, is indeed<br />
a triumph.&#8221;<br />
Now perhaps Mr. Mundkowsky will reply, &#8220;Well, L.P. Hartley doesn&#8217;t know what<br />
HIS novel really is about, and neither do the film-makers.&#8221;<br />
But some us who have enjoyed this film for the last 50 years may offer the polite<br />
but firm counter: NO, Mr. Mundkowsky, it is YOU who are &#8220;talking through<br />
your hat&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
