<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Making Sense of the Ukraine Situation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://travelingboy.com/travel/ukraine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://travelingboy.com/travel/ukraine/</link>
	<description>Traveling Adventures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:06:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Raoul		</title>
		<link>https://travelingboy.com/travel/ukraine/#comment-25127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raoul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 18:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://travelingboy.com/travel/?p=29508#comment-25127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your lead on alternative news sources. I think you left out a few other sources which are more on the center right. Too bad the bias comes before the objective information when it comes to modern-day journalism.  This negative sensationalism trend polarizes and it is destroys the relationship of people from different sides who think only they actually love their country. 

Maybe there should be a news rating board where stats on which news channel had the most errors, most accurate, etc. --- but even as I say this, the question arises on who will be doing the judging because even that process is prone to biases.

Maybe there should be a law stating that at least 30% of opposing views should be in every single news agency from the top down. Let the journalists square it out with each other before they broadcast to the public. Another suggestion is to have news channels color coded so we can expect the bias: Red is conservative leaning, blue if liberal leaning, green is libertarian leaning, yellow is communist leaning, etc.  Well, you get the idea.

Again, thanks for this piece. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your lead on alternative news sources. I think you left out a few other sources which are more on the center right. Too bad the bias comes before the objective information when it comes to modern-day journalism.  This negative sensationalism trend polarizes and it is destroys the relationship of people from different sides who think only they actually love their country. </p>
<p>Maybe there should be a news rating board where stats on which news channel had the most errors, most accurate, etc. &#8212; but even as I say this, the question arises on who will be doing the judging because even that process is prone to biases.</p>
<p>Maybe there should be a law stating that at least 30% of opposing views should be in every single news agency from the top down. Let the journalists square it out with each other before they broadcast to the public. Another suggestion is to have news channels color coded so we can expect the bias: Red is conservative leaning, blue if liberal leaning, green is libertarian leaning, yellow is communist leaning, etc.  Well, you get the idea.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for this piece. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
